All Articles
Legal Operations
TBT: Motivating A Team To Teach Me
In this #ThrowbackThursday interview from 2018, McGuireWoods Chairman Jon Harmon, a veteran of Desert Storm, discusses his reliance on “servant leadership.”
Read More
Privilege
Do Regular Attorney-Client Principles Apply in the Governmental Setting?
Courts' application of the attorney-client privilege to government lawyers' communications reflects the tension between the public interest in government transparency and the societal benefit of public officials and employees obtaining legal advice.
Read More
Privilege
Courts Apply the "Intensely Practical" Work Product Doctrine: Part II
Last week's Privilege Point described a court’s rejection of work product protection for a preprinted post-accident form with seemingly helpful boilerplate language about its purpose and a lawyer's involvement — but without any follow through.
Read More
Privilege
Courts Apply The "Intensely Practical" Work Product Doctrine: Part I
The work product doctrine has been described by many courts as "intensely practical." Several decisions highlight this understandable adjective, and explicitly provide useful guidance for lawyers representing litigants and clients who anticipate litigation.
Read More
Privilege
Northern District of Illinois Helpfully Explains The Work Product Doctrine Protection’s Contextual Basis
As these Privilege Points have repeatedly emphasized, privilege protection depends on communications' content — which must be primarily motivated by a client's request for legal advice, or the lawyer's responsive provision of legal advice.
Read More
Privilege
May Litigants Advance Their Case Using Purloined Privileged Documents?
Given the vulnerability of electronic communications to intrusion, lawyers sometimes obtain and may be tempted to use documents that their clients have inappropriately obtained from an adversary – even privileged documents.
Read More
Privilege
Can the Loser Immediately Appeal an Order Requiring Production of Privileged Communications?
One might think that a litigant should be able to file an interlocutory appeal of an order to produce arguably privileged documents. In such an obvious "cat out of the bag" situation, waiting until a final order does not do much to remedy an erroneous compulsion order.
Read More