All Articles

Privilege

Minnesota Recognizes the Common Interest Doctrine

Under the common interest doctrine, separately represented clients can avoid the normal waiver implications of sharing privileged communications by entering into a contractual arrangement.

Read More

Privilege

Musk-Twitter Feud Privilege Fallout: Part II

Last week's Privilege Point described a Delaware court's acknowledgment that the normal In re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd., 322 B.R. 247, 257 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005), standard does not apply to the world's wealthiest man. Four days later, Musk lost a privilege issue, under standard privilege log doctrine.

Read More

Privilege

Musk-Twitter Feud Privilege Fallout: Part I

Not surprisingly, the Musk-Twitter fast-track Delaware case generated privilege issues. One predictably recognized Musk's unique role in his varied revolutionary enterprises.

Read More

Privilege

How Does the Common Interest Doctrine Work in the Intellectual Property Context?

Two recent intellectual property cases highlight courts' widely varying approaches to the common interest doctrine protection.

Read More

Privilege

Defendant’s Sloppy Language and Log Doom Work Product Claim

Litigants asserting work product protection must (if called upon to do so) identify the exact moment when they first anticipated litigation, and consistently apply that date when withholding and logging documents.

Read More

Privilege

Courts Address Work Product Protection for Non-Testifying Consulting Experts: Part II

Last week's Privilege Point summarized a case confirming non-testifying experts' general immunity from discovery — absent "exceptional circumstances" such as destructive testing. Ten days later, another court addressed discovery of what are called "dual hat" experts — providing both consulting advice and testimony.

Read More

Privilege

Courts Address Work Product Protection for Non-Testifying Consulting Experts: Part I

Many courts address the discovery available from a litigant's testifying experts. Fewer courts assess discovery of a litigant's consultant retained to provide background expertise rather than testifying.

Read More