All Articles
Privilege
Copying a Lawyer on an Email Does Not Assure Privilege Protection, but That Lawyer Can Increase the Odds
Lawyers should remind their clients that copying a lawyer on an email does not automatically render the email privileged. But the story doesn't end there.
Read MorePrivilege
Can the Privilege Protect Documents Prepared by Someone Who Has Never Hired a Lawyer?
The attorney-client privilege protects communications between clients and their lawyers. But in certain admittedly limited circumstances, the protection can apply to documents created by someone who has not yet hired a lawyer.
Read MorePrivilege
Three Subject Matter Waiver Decisions Send Mixed Signals: Part III
Under general common law doctrine and Federal Rule of Evidence 502, courts normally hold that disclosing privileged communications only triggers a subject matter waiver if the disclosure seeks some advantage in court. But some courts find a subject matter waiver in broader circumstances.
Read MorePrivilege
Three Subject Matter Waiver Decisions Send Mixed Signals: Part II
In his previous Privilege Point, McGuireWoods partner Thomas Spahn described a decision applying the subject matter waiver doctrine, which relies on fairness notions to prevent litigants from relying on privileged communications as a "sword" while simultaneously using the privilege as a "shield." Here, he picks up where he left off.
Read MorePrivilege
Three Subject Matter Waiver Decisions Send Mixed Signals: Part I
Understandably based on fairness notions, the subject matter waiver doctrine prevents litigants from explicitly or impliedly using privileged communications as a "sword" while simultaneously asserting the privilege as a "shield" to prevent discovery of related communications. As with many privilege concepts, applying the subject matter waiver doctrine can involve subtle analyses.
Read MorePrivilege
Slip and Fall Case Provides Useful Guidance for More Serious Scenarios: Part II
Last week's Privilege Point described a Louisville, Kentucky, restaurant's loss of privilege protection because it could not prove that the managers providing information after a slip and fall knew the "investigation notes'" purpose. Bobalik v. BJ's Restaurants, Inc., Case No. 3:19-CV-0661-RGJ-LLK, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231289 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2020). The court then turned to the restaurant’s work product assertion.
Read MorePrivilege
Slip and Fall Case Provides Useful Guidance for More Serious Scenarios: Part I
Under the commonly (but not universally) recognized Upjohn standard, a corporation's lawyer may engage in privileged communications with any level of corporate employee who has information the lawyer needs. But that favorable Upjohn standard is not self-executing – there is another condition lawyers must satisfy.
Read More