Kevin B. Leblang


  • Monday, January 1, 2007
    In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Target Corp., 460 F.3d 946 (7th Cir. 2006), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Target, finding that triable issues existed as to whether the retailer failed to hire African American job applicants for managerial positions based on their...
  • Monday, January 1, 2007
    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a jury finding of age discrimination premised upon alleged disparate impact in Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab. a/k/a KAPL Inc. , 381 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2004) (" Meacham I "). On remand from the United States Supreme Court, the Second Circuit reversed position, finding that the plaintiffs failed to prove that...
  • Friday, September 1, 2006
    The whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the 'Act' or 'SOX') protects employees of public companies who report conduct they reasonably believe constitutes a violation of federal law relating to financial, securities or shareholder fraud. Recently, a number of important decisions have been handed down interpreting this provision.
  • Tuesday, November 1, 2005
  • Tuesday, February 1, 2005
    Part I of this article appears in the December 2004 issue and Part II appears in the January 2005 issue of The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. The Investigation ReportAnd Remedial Action
  • Saturday, January 1, 2005
    Part I of this article appears in the December 2004 issue and Part III appear in the February 2005 issue of The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel and will focus on the investigation report, remedial action and special issues implicated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Planning the Investigation
  • Wednesday, December 1, 2004
    Parts II and III of this article appear in the January 2005 and February 2005 issues of The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. Part II will focus on planning and conducting the interviews.