FBAR Principles For A Fund Principal - Follow Up To FBAR Controversies

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 - 00:00

Foreign Bank and Financial Account ("FBAR") reporting, historically and currently driven by the Bank Secretary Act ("BSA"), as of late captured the interest of the IRS, which now administers FBAR compliance. This teaming up has created a number of definitional and interpretational questions with respect to the FBAR reporting requirements, which have yet to be clarified. Many clients and practitioners find themselves in a difficult position due to the recent, unofficial yet very definite statements from the IRS that appear to have greatly expanded the types of financial accounts that may require FBAR reports. The IRSreleased on May 6, 2009 details on Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQs") regarding FBARcompliance, with FAQ describing the relief available for FBARs filed by September 23, 2009 if the taxpayer recently learned of the filing requirement and 2008 tax has been paid. While the IRS has granted taxpayers an extension of time to file 2008 FBAR forms (and in some cases where taxpayers were unaware of a filing requirement for prior periods), there is still much uncertainty in the rules themselves.

The Treasury Form TD F 90-22.1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) was extensively revised and greatly lengthened in October 2008. Though the October expansion of the rules captured a broad audience, the space that it most significantly affected was the Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") space, particularly hedge funds, including entities, principals and investors. Much confusion resulted from what those structures and their operations implied in the context of applying the detailed and often confusing FBAR reporting requirements to specific situations and fact patterns.

The statutory provision authorizing the FBAR requirement is very general, and the Treasury Department regulations governing the definitions, such as what is a "financial account," are not detailed. Interpretation of the FBAR requirements is left to the instructions to the form, and to informal guidance by IRS personnel. The instructions state that a "financial account" includes "any bank, securities, securities derivatives or other financial instruments accounts." The instructions go on to state that a financial account includes "accounts in which the assets are held in a commingled fund, and the account owner holds an equity interest in the fund (including mutual funds)."

Thus, the instructions include in the definition of "account" a mutual fund, but provide no further definitional language and do not address whether a private investment company organized under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction (that is, an "offshore hedge fund") is a "foreign account." Several IRS personnel have recently been reported to have stated that a foreign fund is treated as a "foreign account" for FBAR reporting purposes. Therefore, in the view of these IRS employees, every U.S. person that is an investor in a foreign fund has an obligation to file an FBAR report. For protective purposes, many large banks that administer hedge funds internally issued a deluge of letters to investors in late June, and these holdings are now being reviewed on an individual basis for potential reporting requirements for the new September deadline.

Explained elsewhere in the definitional provisions of the Instructions, a "Financial Interest" in a "Financial Account" can also include a U.S. person where the account is maintained on their behalf by another person and a U.S. person who owns more than a 50 percent profits or capital interest in a partnership (or more than a 50 percent of value or voting power in interest in the case of a corporation). Though not specifically stated, it can be interpolated that any instance where 50 percent or more of the "control" of an entity can be attributed to any U.S. person, that person would have a filing requirement. For example, in a typical hedge fund context, if a domestic LLC "controls" the master offshore fund, that domestic LLC must file an FBAR for the underlying offshore master fund, as "financial interest" is now defined to represent "ownership" of 50 percent or more of the value or 50 percent or more of the voting power (in this case interchangeable with "control") of an underlying entity otherwise holding a financial account, if that underlying entity is organized as a corporation. Similar principles would apply if the underlying entity is organized as a partnership.

In the most common hedge fund structures, including the basic Master-Feeder structure, the Side-by-Side structure, and the Mini-Master-Feeder model, the principal generally has several channels of exposure, including signature authority over the GP and Management Company entities, but unlikely through the Onshore Feeder Fund, which in most cases is only fractionally owned by the principal and hence any foreign holdings of the Onshore Fund are diluted to the individual investors in that entity.

While the correct reporting is still a matter of speculation, in light of the potential for penalties for failure to report an account, preparing FBAR reports to include all accounts and/or situations discussed above has been most practitioners' response to the last-minute hiatus over the FBAR filing requirements. Further guidance is awaited from the IRS, which may require amended or late filings for years prior to and including 2008. In the meantime, taxpayers should use this time to review their holdings and identify any potential filing requirements.

Lydia Trepelkova is a Tax Manager in WTAS's New York City office.

Please email lydia.trepelkova@wtas.com or michael.s.maglio@wtas.com with questions about this article.